Estrategias de enseñanza efectivas para los tiempos de y pospandemia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62325/10.62325/yachana.v10.n2.2021.674Palabras clave:
educación, instrucción, enseñanza asistida por ordenadorResumen
La pandemia por el COVID-19 ha llevado a que los programas educativos convencionales continúen bajo la modalidad de enseñanza remota. Para esto, los docentes deben implementar escenarios de aprendizaje apoyados en computadores y recursos multimedia a través de Internet. A fin de que esta “nueva normalidad” produzca los resultados de aprendizaje esperados, la enseñanza remota debe diseñarse y implementarse a partir del conocimiento más sólido sobre cómo las personas aprenden mejor usando los recursos multimedia. Esto conlleva la creación de entornos de aprendizaje dinámicos y personalizados que se ajusten a las necesidades cognitivas de los estudiantes. Este artículo insiste a favor de un enfoque de enseñanza explícita, directa y ajustada a los conocimientos de los estudiantes. De acuerdo con esto, se presenta un conjunto de estrategias provenientes de las perspectivas cognitivas, tales como la teoría la carga cognitiva, del aprendizaje multimedia y las dificultades deseables, para fomentar ambientes de aprendizajes adaptables que optimicen el procesamiento dual de la multimedia y promuevan aprendizajes a plago plazo.
Descargas
Citas
Alpizar, D., Adesope, O. O., & Wong, R. M. (2020). A meta-analysis of signaling principle in multimedia learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development. doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09748-7
Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. (2000). Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 181-214. doi:10.3102/00346543070002181
Ayres, P., Sweller, J., & Mayer, R. (2014). The split-attention principle in multimedia learning. In The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 206-226). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (2011). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 1-29. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422
Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2011). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society. (pp. 56-64). New York, NY, US: Worth Publishers.
Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185-215). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bjork, R. A. (2013). Desirable difficulties perspective on learning. In H. E. Pashler (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the mind (pp. 242-244). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
Bryson, J. R., & Andres, L. (2020). Covid-19 and rapid adoption and improvisation of online teaching: curating resources for extensive versus intensive online learning experiences. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 1-16. doi:10.1080/03098265.2020.1807478
Buchin, Z. L., & Mulligan, N. W. (2017). The testing effect under divided attention. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 43(12), 1934-1947. doi:10.1037/xlm0000427
Chen, O., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2016). The expertise reversal effect is a variant of the more general element interactivity effect. Educational Psychology Review, 29(2), 393–405. doi:10.1007/s10648-016-9359-1
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. (2014). Multimedia Learning in e-Courses. In The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 842-882).
Cowan, N. (2016). Working memory capacity: Classic edition. New York, NY: Routledge.
Dennen, V. P., & Burner, K. J. (2008). The cognitive apprenticeship model in educational practice. In M. J. Spector, M. D.
Merrill, J. J. G. Van Merriënboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 425-439). London, UK: Taylor and Francis.
Duffy, T. M. (2009). Building lines of communication and a research agenda. In S. Tobias & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? (pp. 351-367). New York, NY: Routledge.
Gilchrist, A. L., & Cowan, N. (2011). Can the focus of attention accommodate multiple, separate items? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(6), 1484. doi:10.1037/a0024352
Goodman, G. S. (2008). Educational psychology: An application of critical constructivism. New York, NY.: Peter Lang.
Hanham, J., Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2017). Cognitive load theory, element interactivity, and the testing and reverse testing effects. Applied Cognitive Psychology, n/a-n/a. doi:10.1002/acp.3324
Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2020). The Economic Impacts of Learning Losses. Education Working Papers, 225. doi:10.1787/21908d74-en
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Jonassen, D. (2009). Reconciling a human cognitive architecture. In S. Tobias & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? (pp. 13-33). New York, NY: Routledge.
Kalpana, T. (2014). A constructivist perspective on teaching and learning: A conceptual framework. International Research Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 27-29. Retrieved from http://isca.me/IJSS/Archive/v3/i1/6.ISCA-IRJSS-2013-186.pdf
Kalyuga, S. (2007). Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 19(4), 509-539. doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9054-3
Kalyuga, S. (2013). Rapid dynamic assessment for learning. In M. M. C. Mok (Ed.), Self-directed Learning Oriented Assessments in the Asia-Pacific (Vol. 18, pp. 43-60): Springer Netherlands.
Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 23-31. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3801_4
Kalyuga, S., & Mayer, R. (2014). The Expertise Reversal Principle in Multimedia Learning. In The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 576-597).
Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2005). Rapid dynamic assessment of expertise to improve the efficiency of adaptive e-learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3), 83-93. doi:10.1007/BF02504800
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., Kirschner, F., & Zambrano R., J. (2018). From cognitive load theory to collaborative cognitive load theory. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(2), 213-233. doi:10.1007/s11412-018-9277-y
Korbach, A., Brünken, R., & Park, B. (2016). Learner characteristics and information processing in multimedia learning: A moderated mediation of the seductive details effect. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 59-68. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.030
Kostons, D., van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2010). Self-assessment and task selection in learner-controlled instruction: Differences between effective and ineffective learners. Computers & Education, 54(4), 932-940. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131509002668
Lau, K. H. (2014). Computer-based teaching module design: Principles derived from learning theories. Med Educ, 48(3), 247-254. doi:10.1111/medu.12357
Low, R., Sweller, J., & Mayer, R. (2014). The Modality Principle in Multimedia Learning. In The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 227-246).
Mayer, R. E. (2012). Information processing. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, C. B. McCormick, G. M. Sinatra, & J. Sweller (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Theories, constructs, and critical issues (Vol. 1, pp. 85-99). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
Mayer, R. E. (2014). Introduction to multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 1-25). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning (3th ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., & Fiorella, L. (2014). Principles for Reducing Extraneous Processing in Multimedia Learning: Coherence, Signaling, Redundancy, Spatial Contiguity, and Temporal Contiguity Principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (2 ed., pp. 279-315). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McLaren, B. M., Van Gog, T., Ganoe, C., Karabinos, M., & Yaron, D. (2016). The efficiency of worked examples compared to erroneous examples, tutored problem solving, and problem solving in computer-based learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, Part A, 87-99. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.038
Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43-59. doi:10.1007/bf02505024
Murillo, F. J., & Martinez-Garrido, C. (2014). Homework and primary-school students’ academic achievement in Latin America. International Review of Education, 60(5), 661-681. doi:10.1007/s11159-014-9440-2
Núñez, J. C., Suárez, N., Cerezo, R., González-Pienda, J., Rosário, P., Mourão, R., & Valle, A. (2013). Homework and academic achievement across Spanish Compulsory Education. Educational Psychology, 35(6), 726-746. doi:10.1080/01443410.2013.817537
Oberauer, K., Lewandowsky, S., Awh, E., Brown, G. D. A., Conway, A., Cowan, N., . . . Ward, G. (2018). Benchmarks for models of short-term and working memory. Psychol Bull, 144(9), 885-958. doi:10.1037/bul0000153
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Panzarasa, P., Kujawski, B., Hammond, E. J., & Michael Roberts, C. (2015). Temporal patterns and dynamics of e-learning usage in medical education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(1), 13-35. doi:10.1007/s11423-015-9407-4
Park, B., Moreno, R., Seufert, T., & Brünken, R. (2011). Does cognitive load moderate the seductive details effect? A multimedia study. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 5-10. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.006
Pereira, C., Taylor, J., & Jones, M. (2009). Less Learning, More Often: The Impact of Spacing Effect in An Adult E-Learning Environment. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 15(1), 17-28. doi:10.1177/147797140901500103
Reigeluth, C. M. (2012). Teoría instruccional y tecnología para el nuevo paradigma de la educación. RED Revista de Educación a Distancia, 32, 1-22. Retrieved from http://www.um.es/ead/red/32
Retnowati, E., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2018). Collaborative learning effects when students have complete or incomplete knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology. doi:10.1002/acp.3444
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249-255. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2011). Intricacies of spaced retrieval. A resolution. In A. S. Benjamin (Ed.), Successful remembering and successful forgetting: A festschrift in honor of Robert A. Bjork (pp. 23-48). New York: Psychology Press.
Roger H., B., Gregory J., S., & Monica M., N. (2012). Psicología cognitiva y de la instrucción (5th ed.). Madrid: Pearson Educación S.A.
Roser, M., Ritchie, H., & Ortiz-Ospina, E. (2020). Internet access. Internet. Retrieved from https://ourworldindata.org/internet#internet-access
Rummer, R., Schweppe, J., Fürstenberg, A., Scheiter, K., & Zindler, A. (2011). The perceptual basis of the modality effect in multimedia learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17(2), 159-173.
Sanchez, C. A., & Wiley, J. (2006). An examination of the seductive details effect in terms of working memory capacity. Memory & Cognition, 34(2), 344-355. doi:10.3758/BF03193412
Schneider, S., Beege, M., Nebel, S., & Rey, G. D. (2018). A meta-analysis of how signaling affects learning with media. Educational Research Review, 23, 1-24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.11.001
Schunk, D. H. (2020). Learning theories: An educational perspective (8th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
Simon, D. A., & Bjork, R. A. (2001). Metacognition in motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(4), 907-912. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.4.907
Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Straetmans, G. J. J. M., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2008). Integrating authentic assessment with competence‐based learning in vocational education: the Protocol Portfolio Scoring. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 60(2), 159-172. doi:10.1080/13636820802042438
Soderstrom, N. C., & Bjork, R. A. (2015). Learning versus performance: An integrative review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 176-199. doi:10.1177/1745691615569000
Song, H. S., Kalet, A. L., & Plass, J. L. (2015). Interplay of prior knowledge, self-regulation and motivation in complex multimedia learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/jcal.12117
Sternberg, R., & Sternberg, K. (2017). Cognitive psychology (7th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.
Sundararajan, N., & Adesope, O. (2020). Keep it Coherent: A Meta-Analysis of the Seductive Details Effect. Educational Psychology Review. doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09522-4
Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In P. M. Jose & H. R. Brian (Eds.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 55, pp. 37-76). San Diego, CA; London, UK: Academic Press.
Sweller, J. (2016). Working memory, long-term memory, and instructional design. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5(4), 360–367. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.12.002
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011a). Cognitive load theory. New York, NY: Springer.
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011b). The split-attention effect. In J. Sweller, P. Ayres, & S. Kalyuga (Eds.), Cognitive Load Theory (pp. 111-128). London, UK: Springer.
Tobias, S., & Duffy, T. M. (2009). Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? New York: Routledge.
Unsworth, N. (2019). Individual differences in long-term memory. Psychological Bulletin, 145(1), 79-139. doi:10.1037/bul0000176
van Gog, T. (2014). The Signaling (or Cueing) Principle in Multimedia Learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (2 ed., pp. 263-278). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2018). Ten steps to complex learning: A systematic approach to four-component instructional design (3th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Wiseheart, M., Küpper-Tetzel, C. E., Weston, T., Kim, A. S. N., Kapler, I. V., & Foot-Seymour, V. (2019). Enhancing the Quality of Student Learning Using Distributed Practice. In The Cambridge Handbook of Cognition and Education (pp. 550-584).
Yue, C. L., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2013). Reducing verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: An undesired desirable difficulty? Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 266. doi:10.1037/a0031971
Zambrano R., J., Kirschner, F., Sweller, J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2019). Effects of prior knowledge on collaborative and individual learning. Learning and Instruction, 63. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.05.011
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Yachana Revista Científica
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Los autores de las contribuciones que sean seleccionadas para su publicación en Yachana Revista Científica conservan sus derechos de autor bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional. Revisar la Política de derechos de autor en el siguiente link: aquí
